首页> 外文OA文献 >Diagnostic Performance of Filter Paper Lesion Impression PCR for Secondarily Infected Ulcers and Nonulcerative Lesions Caused by Cutaneous Leishmaniasis▿
【2h】

Diagnostic Performance of Filter Paper Lesion Impression PCR for Secondarily Infected Ulcers and Nonulcerative Lesions Caused by Cutaneous Leishmaniasis▿

机译:滤纸病变印象PCR对皮肤利什曼病继发感染和非溃疡性病变的诊断性能Diagnostic

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We compared traditional cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnostic methods to filter paper lesion impression (FPLI) PCR for secondarily infected ulcers and nonulcerative lesions. The sensitivity and specificity of FPLI PCR for secondarily infected lesions (n = 8) were 100%. In primarily nonulcerative lesions (n = 15), the sensitivity of FPLI PCR was inferior to that of pooled-invasive-specimen PCR (72.7% versus 100%) (P = 0.10). FPLI PCR is sensitive, specific, and unlike invasive procedures, can be used in secondarily infected ulcers. Invasive specimen collection is superior in nonulcerative lesions.
机译:我们比较了传统的皮肤利什曼病皮肤病诊断方法,对继发感染的溃疡和非溃疡性病变的滤纸病变印象(FPLI)PCR进行了比较。 FPLI PCR对继发感染病灶(n = 8)的敏感性和特异性为100%。在主要是非溃疡性病变(n = 15)中,FPLI PCR的敏感性低于合并侵入性标本的敏感性(72.7%对100%)(P = 0.10)。 FPLI PCR具有敏感性,特异性和不同于侵入性程序的特点,可用于继发感染的溃疡。在非溃疡性病变中,有创标本采集效果更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号